Suchergebnisse

In search of the starting points of the title concept one can focus on the EU law as a broadly viewed basis encompassing the accession of the states to the European Union, thus their membership. In this context the following important question may be asked, i.e. where we obtain the knowledge of the European Union. Referring to the juridical correlation in place, we would then say that the answer lies in the respective treaty ofthe primary law of the EU It goes without saying that this answer is not subject to doubt.
However, the answer itself does not prove comprehensive when we differentiate the foundation of the European Union, then the formal membership, and its development affiliation. Generally speaking, the first two areas legitimise the above presented 'fromwhere' in a different way from the way it is subject to legitimisation in the third area. The particle gains in importance as we still tend to (ultimately) explain the development of the European Union through the European legislation. One can apply this approach, yetone should also bear in mind that such action proves, above all, one-sided. The action primarily proves anti-developmental as it finds itself unable to shed light on the EU in the numerous aspects of its functioning.For the reasons given above, the main thesis of the paper is that, in the methodological ways of examining the thought, the European Union should be subject to examination through the EU as a community, i.e. the EU within the EU To help exemplify the reasoning, I applied the familiar inter, which is broadly applied in the methodologies of science. I ascribe the generation of new concepts to it, the ones that allow to examinethe complex structures of the EU, and through the examination it is hoped to coin new postulates that concern the steering of the EU as a way of practice. Undoubtedly, the inter is reconstructed on grounds of the up-to-date knowledge of itself. Only then do we conceptualise it, and arising out of this conceptualisation, we would reconstruct the postulates aimed at the EU, yet not in the narrow-juridical categories as the EU law doesnot exhibit a separately differentiated theory.

In search of the starting points of the title concept one can focus on the EU law as a broadly viewed basis encompassing the accession of the states to the European Union, thus their membership. In this context the following important question may be asked, i.e. where we obtain the knowledge of the European Union. Referring to the juridical correlation in place, we would then say that the answer lies in the respective treaty of the primary law of the EU It goes without saying that this answer is not subject to doubt. However, the answer itself does not prove comprehensive when we differentiate the foundation of the European Union, then the formal membership, and its development affiliation. Generally speaking, the first two areas legitimise the above presented 'from where' in a different way from the way it is subject to legitimisation in the third area. The particle gains in importance as we still tend to (ultimately) explain the development of the European Union through the European legislation. One can apply this approach, yet one should also bear in mind that such action proves, above all, one-sided. The action primarily proves anti-developmental as it finds itself unable to shed light on the EU in the numerous aspects of its functioning. For the reasons given above, the main thesis of the paper is that, in the methodological ways of examining the thought, the European Union should be subject to examination through the EU as a community, i.e. the EU within the EU To help exemplify the reasoning, I applied the familiar inter, which is broadly applied in the methodologies of science. I ascribe the generation of new concepts to it, the ones that allow to examine the complex structures of the EU, and through the examination it is hoped to coin new postulates that concern the steering of the EU as a way of practice. Undoubtedly, the inter is reconstructed on grounds of the up-to-date knowledge of itself. Only then do we conceptualise it, and arising out of this conceptualisation, we would reconstruct the postulates aimed at the EU, yet not in the narrow-juridical categories as the EU law does not exhibit a separately differentiated theory. ; Poszukując punktu wyjścia dla tytułowej koncepcji, można koncentrować się na prawie Unii Europejskiej jako szeroko postrzeganej podstawie, obejmującej akcesję państw UE, a zatem ich członkostwo. W tym kontekście można postawić następujące istotne pytanie: Skąd możemy otrzymać wiedzę o Unii Europejskiej? Odnosząc się do prawnej korelacji w tym zakresie, możemy powiedzieć, że odpowiedź na nie leży w odpowiednim traktacie pierwotnego prawa Unii Europejskiej. Jest oczywiste, że ta odpowiedź nie jest przedmiotem wątpliwości. Jednakże sama odpowiedź nie okazuje się całościowa, kiedy zróżnicujemy fundamenty Unii Europejskiej wobec formalnego członkostwa i rozwoju przynależności. Ogólnie mówiąc, pierwsze dwa obszary legitymizują przedstawione powyżej pytanie, dotyczące "skąd", w odmienny sposób w stosunku do sposobu, w jaki jest legitymizowane w trzecim obszarze. Część zyskuje na znaczeniu wraz z tym, jak skłaniamy się, aby (ostatecznie) wyjaśnić rozwój Unii Europejskiej przez europejską legislację. Można zastosować to podejście, ale należy brać pod uwagę, że takie działanie okazuje się, przede wszystkim, jednowymiarowe. Działanie, zasadniczo, okazuje się antyrozwojowe, jako że uznaje się je za niezdolne do rzucenia światła na Unię Europejską w wielu aspektach jej funkcjonowania. Z powyższych powodów główna teza tekstu głosi, że metodologiczne sposoby badania Unii Europejskiej powinny być oparte na odwołaniu się do badania Unii jako wspólnoty, Unia w ramach Unii. Aby pomóc zilustrować to rozumowanie, stosuję znane inter, które jest szeroko stosowane w metodologiach nauk. Przypisuję mu generację nowych koncepcji, te, które pozwalają na badanie złożonych struktur UE, i przez badanie powstaje nadzieja na ukucie nowych postulatów dotyczących kierowania Unią jako praktyką. Niewątpliwie inter jest zrekonstruowany na podstawie nowoczesnej wiedzy jako takiej. Tylko wówczas konceptualizujemy ją i wychodzimy od tej konceptualizacji, rekonstruujemy postulaty skierowane do UE, już nie w wąskich, prawniczych kategoriach, jako że prawo UE nie przedstawia odrębnie zróżnicowanej teorii.

In search of the starting points of the title concept one can focus on the EU law as a broadly viewed basis encompassing the accession of the states to the European Union, thus their membership. In this context the following important question may be asked, i.e. where we obtain the knowledge of the European Union. Referring to the juridical correlation in place, we would then say that the answer lies in the respective treaty of the primary law of the EU It goes without saying that this answer is not subject to doubt. However, the answer itself does not prove comprehensive when we differentiate the foundation of the European Union, then the formal membership, and its development affiliation. Generally speaking, the first two areas legitimise the above presented 'from where' in a different way from the way it is subject to legitimisation in the third area. The particle gains in importance as we still tend to (ultimately) explain the development of the European Union through the European legislation. One can apply this approach, yet one should also bear in mind that such action proves, above all, one-sided. The action primarily proves anti-developmental as it finds itself unable to shed light on the EU in the numerous aspects of its functioning. For the reasons given above, the main thesis of the paper is that, in the methodological ways of examining the thought, the European Union should be subject to examination through the EU as a community, i.e. the EU within the EU To help exemplify the reasoning, I applied the familiar inter, which is broadly applied in the methodologies of science. I ascribe the generation of new concepts to it, the ones that allow to examine the complex structures of the EU, and through the examination it is hoped to coin new postulates that concern the steering of the EU as a way of practice. Undoubtedly, the inter is reconstructed on grounds of the up-to-date knowledge of itself. Only then do we conceptualise it, and arising out of this conceptualisation, we would reconstruct the postulates aimed at the EU, yet not in the narrow-juridical categories as the EU law does not exhibit a separately differentiated theory.

Tradycyjnie jakość prawa wiązana jest z dochowaniem pewnych reguł jego tworzenia(tzw. reguł dobrej legislacji). Myślenie to jest wielce uproszczone. W rozważaniachzwrócono uwagę na to, że czym innym jest jakość prawa, a czym innym przestrzeganiereguł jego tworzenia. Wszak może być i tak, że prawo stworzone w zastosowaniu dobrej legislacji nie musi być prawem wysokiej (zadowalającej) jakości. Zwłaszcza przy założeniu, że o jakości prawa stanowi głównie poziom dostarczanego bezpieczeństwaprawnego. Rozważania oparto na przekonaniu, że problematyka jakości prawa należyprzede wszystkim do sfery badawczej prawa. W tym kontekście refleksje nad jakościąprawa umożliwiły spostrzeżenie, że rozwój tej jakości nieodzownie kojarzy się z rozwojem teorii prawa. Jeżeli chodzi o badanie jakości prawa jako miary bezpieczeństwa, to nasuwające się zagadnienia ujęto w szkicowej postaci w trzech zakresach: 1. Jakośćprawa z punktu widzenia jego formacji, formacjogenności w odniesieniu do zjawiskspołecznych ogólnie wziętych, 2. Jakość prawa w odniesieniu do osoby oraz 3. Jakośćprawa w działalności sądowej.

Traditionally, the quality of law is associated with observing certain principles of law making, the so-called principles of good legislation. Such a way of thinking, however, seems to be an over-simplification. Thus, the author indicates that the high-quality of legislation and the principles of good legislation are not the same. Law passed on the basis of good legislation procedures does not automatically result in the high-quality law, in particular, if one makes an assumption that the quality of law depends, above all, on legal certainty being ensured. The reflections presented here express an opinion on the immediate connection between the quality of law and the theory of law. In this perspective, thoughts on the quality of law resulted in an opinion how firmly the process of improvement in law quality is associated with the development of the theory of law. As regards the studies on the quality of law as a measure of legal certainty, three issues are pointed out in the material: 1. the quality of law from the point of view of its formation in reference to certain general social phenomena, 2. the quality of law relating to a person, 3. the quality of law in judicial activities.